Disgusting 93-7 US Senate Vote

Posted December 2nd, 2011 by Iron Mike

I will briefly explain a hidden provision of Senate Bill 1867 passed Thursday night.

But FIRST – put your food and drinks down – out of your hands!!!

Number: S. 1867 (National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 )

Measure Title: An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes

Basically it’s a spending bill.  But tucked into it is a section to repeal Article 125 of the UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice – the laws our military are subject to].

Because being OPENLY GAY is now legal in our military – the Senate is repealing the laws against sodomy [having sex with a person’s tailpipe].  And WITH that – the laws against bestiality – [people having sex with animals].

Are we to assume 93 Senators
didn’t read the damned thing,

 or are we to assume they just don’t give a damn? 

Heck of a Christmas Present for our military, and our nation, eh?

John Kerry’s DC office     (202) 224-2742

Scott Brown’s DC office   (202) 224-4543

What’s the ‘age of consent’ for an Army horse, mule, or dog?  What’s the ‘age of consent’ for the Naval Academy goats?

How long before some service member wants to marry their horse or dog?  This is what we were talking about when we said that ending DADT was a dangerously slippery slope!

Ain’t cha proud America?

/s/  Iron Mike
Old Soldier, – Still Good for Parts!
[but thoroughly grossed out!]

 

5 Responses to “Disgusting 93-7 US Senate Vote”

  1. Sam Adams

    Scott Brown signed onto this? And his supporters call him CONSERVATIVE?
    Unless they’ve redefined the word, the man’s no different than a freakin’ Democrat!

  2. Kim

    With the real of DADT, I guess the repeal of UCMJ – Article 125, making sodomy a crime – was a given. But why didn’t they leave the bestiality section in? How can that be allowed anywhere? Do you think this undermines public support for our Troops? Will the public now look at them and wonder if they’re doing their goat, cow, horse, whatever… instead of seeing a self-sacrificing Patriot? I read that this was unanimously approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee. I’d love to know their thought process.

  3. Rabid Republican

    Nice one, Mike. 🙂 rr

  4. Bobbie Chase

    This is bigoted. People are born gay or straight. There is nothing wrong with being gay. Marriage is a man-made institution and very recent in comparative history; there is no logical reason why two people of the same sex cannot express their love for each other. And don’t use the argument of not being able to have children; my husband and I do not have children and ours is a perfectly good and valid marriage without children.
    – – – – – –
    Bobbie, read the article again. The key issue is beastiality.

    I’d like my military not to be allowing its members to be having sex with ANIMALS. In that regard, I’m on the side of the animals!

  5. Drako

    I don’t think that there is anything wrong, if a man wants to have sex with a horse or something like that. After all its his personal choice.
    [This clever fellow is from New Delhi, India. Perhaps he looks at a horse as a departed relative?]